Claude consultant for European businesses: rollout, training and support

A Claude consultant sets your business up on Claude, the AI assistant from Anthropic, and stays on after the launch instead of leaving once the invoice is paid. The work covers picking the plan, setting up accounts and permissions, training your team on their own documents, building the first skills (saved instructions Claude reuses) and running licences and support afterwards. With us the whole launch costs €560 per user from 8 users, and the price sits on this page before you ever speak to us.

Every price is published and none of them is hourly. A Claude sprint costs €400 per user for a group of three to eight, a workshop costs €390 per user for a half day or €560 for a full day with at least 8 people, and the full satori-launch costs €560 per user as a one-time fee, which puts the floor at €4,480. Running the platform through satori-claude then costs €14 per user per month plus the Claude licence, Standard €22 or Premium €110, all excluding VAT.

Most of our customers start from zero, and that makes the first weeks easier because nobody has to unlearn a bad habit before the good one sticks. The webinar and the full-day workshop are built for people who have never written a prompt, and we pitch every exercise at the level of the room on the day. A team at the Swedish Volleyball Federation went from very little AI knowledge to most people saving time within weeks, and their Secretary General said so in writing further down this page.

We picked one platform and learned it properly, because a consultant who knows five tools a little teaches your team five tools a little. Claude from Anthropic reads long documents well, follows detailed instructions and comes with commercial terms that keep your inputs out of model training by default, according to Anthropic's own privacy centre. For teams that already run ChatGPT or want a European model, satori-chatgpt and satori-mistral sit on the same fixed-price footing.

Most teams use Claude on real work within the first fortnight, because the webinar comes first and the full-day workshop follows while the questions are still fresh. The first 90 days decide whether the habit lasts, so we check usage at 30 and 90 days and rework any skill nobody opens. A skill that saves nobody any time by day 90 gets rebuilt or removed, and we tell you which one it was.

An IT consultant looks after networks, licences, security and the machines your team works on every day. A Claude consultant looks at the work itself and finds the three or four tasks where Claude takes an hour down to minutes, then trains the people who do them. The two roles sit side by side well: your IT partner owns accounts and access, and we own the training, the skills and the number we measure.

Check three things before you sign anything: a published price, a named method with a deliverable per step, and a plan for what happens after the workshop ends. Ask for one case with a before and after number, and treat a consultant who cannot give you one as a consultant who has not measured anything. Ask directly whether the plan they recommend keeps your data out of model training, since a vague answer tells you what you need to know.

We work with businesses across the EU from our base in Sweden, and remote delivery is the default for webinars, training sessions and the build work itself. Every session runs in English, and we book it in Central European Time (CET), which is one hour ahead of Lisbon and Dublin and one hour behind Helsinki and Athens. Some teams want a full day in the same room, and for those we agree an on-site day and any travel cost in writing before the date is booked. The method, the prices and the people stay the same whether your team sits in Amsterdam, Munich, Lisbon or Tallinn.

We start by writing down how your team handles three recurring tasks today, step by step, with the time each one takes. Then we build the skill or the workflow, test it with the people who will use it and adjust it until they stop asking us questions about it. The whole satori-launch runs over a few weeks, and at the end every user has the same five skills and knows when to reach for them.

Yes, and it is one of the first things customers ask for. We write an AI policy your team actually reads, which covers what data may go into which tool, who approves a new use case and how the EU AI Act classifies what you plan to do. When a question needs a legal opinion we bring in a data protection lawyer, because writing legal advice is not our job and we say so upfront.

Yes. The AI literacy duty in Article 4 of the EU AI Act has applied since 2 February 2025, according to the European Commission, and since the 2026 amendment it asks businesses to take measures that support AI literacy among the people who use AI systems. Our training covers that obligation in practice, and in the policy work we go through how each of your planned uses is classified before anything is built. The rules for high-risk systems in areas like employment now apply from 2 December 2027, so we flag any use case that touches those areas early.

ROI, the return on the time and money you put in, is easiest to prove on one workflow measured in hours before and after. A sales team in one of our cases spent five to ten hours on every quote, the draft now takes thirty seconds, and twenty freed hours a week multiplied by what an hour of a seller costs is the whole calculation. We agree the number before we build anything, since a result nobody measured cannot be proved afterwards.

A Claude consultant builds alongside your team so the knowledge stays with you, while an AI agency does the whole job and hands you the finished result. We offer both: the consultant set-up on this page when you want to learn it yourselves, and our AI agency service when you would rather buy the outcome than the know-how. Think of it as the difference between an architect who teaches you to read the drawings and a builder who hands you the keys.

Recruiting a head of AI often takes six months and costs a salary plus overhead before that person has delivered anything. A consultant is working within days for a fraction of the cost, which makes it the right call when you want to start now and find out whether AI carries weight in your business. Recruit internally once AI is part of the core of the business and the volume justifies a full-time role.

Sports federations, adult education associations, construction and property, architects, manufacturing, insurance, accounting and e-commerce have all gone through a launch with us, mostly in Sweden so far. The method stays the same across industries, because we always start from your actual workflows instead of an industry template. What changes is which systems we connect to and which data is sensitive enough to keep out of a prompt.

Yes, although we call them steps on the AI Ladder instead of pilots. You can stop after any step, which gives you the safety of a pilot without the risk of getting stuck there forever. The property company in our cases ran its meter-data workflow three times with wrong values before it was allowed to replace the external service, and a person still checks the list before the invoice goes out.

The two most common are paying for a report instead of something that works, and watching the knowledge walk out of the door when the engagement ends. We cut both risks with fixed packages that come with deliverables instead of hours, and with training built into every package so your team can run the workflows alone. Ask for one number per deliverable, whoever you hire, because what nobody measures nobody can judge.

Count it per team, not per hour. A team of 10 that buys satori-launch pays €5,600 once for the webinar, the full-day workshop and five finished skills, and then €14 per user per month plus the Claude licence for running the platform. An hourly engagement of two days with preparation often costs as much and leaves no skill behind when the consultant leaves.

Through an MCP server, short for Model Context Protocol, a connector that lets Claude read from and write to your systems without anyone pasting data in by hand, or through RAG, a search step that lets Claude read your own documents before it answers. We start with one system, often the ERP (your enterprise resource planning system) or the document library in Microsoft 365, and connect the next one only when the first works. These builds are quoted per project, because the number of systems and the amount of data decide the price.

Before any tool is switched on we write down which data may go where, in an AI policy the team actually reads. Anthropic says it does not use inputs or outputs from its commercial products to train its models by default, and its Data Processing Addendum, with the EU Standard Contractual Clauses for international transfers, is built into its Commercial Terms. For teams that need processing kept in Europe we can set Claude up through EU cross-region inference on Amazon Bedrock or the EU multi-region endpoint on Google Cloud Vertex AI. A data protection lawyer takes any question that needs a legal opinion.

Yes, if you have at least one recurring task that eats hours every week, and no if you do not. A Claude sprint for five people costs €2,000, and an accounting firm in one of our cases got three hours a week back on a single workflow, so at €40 an hour the sprint pays for itself in about 17 weeks. Without a task like that, buying the licences yourselves and reading our guides is often enough.